Quoting David Burry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If we're not going to fix %s shouldn't we at least fix the documentation to > be more accurate? 2.0 and 1.3 really are quite different here.
I kind of remember that someone was working on this (i.e. on fixing it) a while ago, but I can't remember the details... Or maybe it was the other way around - maybe the Apache 1.3 behaviour was pronounced wrong. Not sure any more. Bojan
