> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 12 October 2002 22:18
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:37:07AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > >I don't have a strong opinion about the authn redesign, > > >but I do have one change in mind that would fit well in > > >2.1: async write support. And async read support, but > > >that may take a lot longer. > > > > My belief is that you should design and code up the async support and > > then we can deliberate about where it should go. > > That seems like a one-way street to me. How come it's ok to work on the > auth changes in 2.0 but it's not ok for others? The auth changes were complete before they were applied in the sense that they didn't leave the tree in a broken state. > > These changes > > shouldn't be held up by the fact that we don't have a 2.1 yet. > > I agree, as a matter of fact, I don't think any changes should be held > up for any reason whatsoever. Sander
