--On Sunday, October 13, 2002 12:30 PM -0500 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far, Two Bills beg that we defer the auth reorg to 2.1. If I > hear three, I will consider it appropriate to veto the auth > reorganization for 2.0, until we start 2.1. The technical > justification would be unreasonable support traffic (via bugzilla, > user lists, etc) in response to administrators as they are forced > through this update. Technically, a reasonable demand for a > version point bump, but not reasonable within a subversion point > bump. I hereby challenge your 'technical' reason for a veto. Unlike APR, httpd does not have a documented versioning system. Therefore, I don't believe there is any expectation to break. And, when we conducted the vote, I explicitly mentioned that we might break backwards compatibility - the rest of the group didn't seem to have a problem with that. If someone else says your reason is technically valid, our rules states that the veto stands. Fine, but I want to see someone else agree. I think Greg and myself have tried to clarify FirstBill's misunderstanding of what changed. -- justin
