* Joshua Slive wrote:
> Exactly what is going to happen with auth is an open issue.
*sigh*. And I thought, I've got it now ;-) (2.0 = keep old, 2.1 introduce
new)
> If this suceeds, then the best thing to do will probably be to revert back
> to the 2.0.43 auth docs, and then build on the new features from there.
> If you want to do that now, I won't object. But since we don't know
> exactly what is going to happen, you may want to wait.
ok, waiting for now.
The main point for me is/was to have a consistent documentation for the
2.0.44+ release(s). Only "back-tagging" in the docs is not the best
variant. Therefore it should be decided sometime...
nd, going to bed now ;-)
--
my @japh = (sub{q~Just~},sub{q~Another~},sub{q~Perl~},sub{q~Hacker~});
my $japh = q[sub japh { }]; print join #########################
[ $japh =~ /{(.)}/] -> [0] => map $_ -> () # Andr� Malo #
=> @japh; # http://www.perlig.de/ #
