On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Andr� Malo wrote: > * Joshua Slive wrote: > > > Exactly what is going to happen with auth is an open issue. > > *sigh*. And I thought, I've got it now ;-) (2.0 = keep old, 2.1 introduce > new)
Ok. Now it appears this is exactly what we are doing. Andre, do you want to take charge of reverting the auths docs changes in the 2.0 tag (and removing the "obsolete" modules in HEAD)? We'll also need to update the cvs checkout on httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/ to get the 2.0 tag rather than HEAD. I guess I probably have the rights to do that. Joshua.
