Greg Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > Has anybody verified that it actually works to not have srclib/apr? > > It doesn't work for me. > > Since buildconf is broken without srclib/apr, I first did buildconf > > then renamed srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util. Configure completed, but > > the generation of exports.c fails since the makefiles assume that apr > > and apr-util header files can be found under srclib. > > Here is what I would recommend: > > a) Set AC_AUX_DIR like it was historically (assume there is > > srclib/apr). > > b) Release 2.0.44 > > c) Re-integrate into APACHE_2_0_BRANCH Fred's changes to separate > > from APR, though with the portability fixes this time. > > Sounds like a plan. > > I'll be happy to change configure.in back, but what do I commit it > against? 2.0-stable? If so, what's the process (since it doesn't make > any sense to put it into 2.1 first)? Post patch & ask for votes > before committing, then make sure Sander knows about it?
put it in stable if somebody else gives it +1 (I assume that you and I are +1 for it :) )... I don't think posting the patch is necessary since we're talking about one line that was mentioned in the first message in this thread -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
