* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > jim: core_server_conf is not exported, per se, but does this > + require nonetheless a MMN (minor) bump? I vote > + +1 if the code is adjusted to (1) allow a value of 0, > + meaning no limit (ala MaxRequestsPerChild) and further > + testing that the default limit of 10 is not too low.
hmm. The zero limit should not be a problem. The testing seems a bit complicated to me. But if it'd help, I'd say, let's be generous and give it 20 ;-) Both for 1.3 only, IMHO. (backwards compat) And before this hangs around just another month, I'll give a +1 on a MMN minor bump. Folks, please wake up. Do we need a minor bump for 1.3 and 2.x (!) for the ap_is_recursion_limit_exceeded function? nd
