+1 from me :) david
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:45 PM Subject: cvs commit: apache-1.3 STATUS > jim 2003/07/10 07:45:23 > > Modified: . STATUS > Log: > Update STATUS > > Revision Changes Path > 1.1039 +7 -12 apache-1.3/STATUS > > Index: STATUS > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v > retrieving revision 1.1038 > retrieving revision 1.1039 > diff -u -r1.1038 -r1.1039 > --- STATUS 6 Jul 2003 21:19:00 -0000 1.1038 > +++ STATUS 10 Jul 2003 14:45:23 -0000 1.1039 > @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ > > Release: > > - 1.3.28-dev: In development. Jim proposes a TAG on July 1, 2003 > - with a RELEASE on July 4, 2003 and offers to be > + 1.3.28-dev: In development. Jim proposes a TAG on July 11 2003 > + with a RELEASE on July 14, 2003 and offers to be > RM. > 1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002. > 1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002. > @@ -45,20 +45,15 @@ > 2.0 : Available for general use, see httpd-2.0 repository > > RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: > - * Backport LimitInteralRecursion from 2.1 to 1.3. > - (1.3 patch is here: <http://cvs.apache.org/~nd/recursion13.patch>) > - PR 19753. > - jim: core_server_conf is not exported, per se, but does this > - require nonetheless a MMN (minor) bump? I vote > - +1 if the code is adjusted to (1) allow a value of 0, > - meaning no limit (ala MaxRequestsPerChild) and further > - testing that the default limit of 10 is not too low. > - +1: jerenkrantz > + > + None > > RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: > > * Current vote on 3 PRs for inclusion: > Bugz #17877 (passing chunked encoding thru proxy) > + (still checking if RFC compliant... vote is on the > + correctness of the patch code only). > +1: jim, chuck, minfrin > Bugz #9181 (Unable to set headers on non-2XX responses) > +1: Martin, Jim > > > >
