* Paul J. Reder wrote: > Its mostly a matter of pedantics. :)
Sure ;-) > Logically the reset should be linked to the actual action > of passing the bytes. In your hypothetical else there are > no bytes, so *all* existing (i.e. 0) bytes have been sent. ... > I'm trying to prevent potential future confusion. Does that > make sense? yes, it does. Convinced :) nd
