* Jim Jagielski wrote: > Hmmm... I wonder if we should hold off on 1.3.28 then. I'm > leaning towards releasing 1.3.28 as-is, and us placing this > in patches/ (and of course, being committed to 1.3.29-dev)...
+1. It's tagged already and therefore no chance for 1.3.28 get any patches in. nd
