* Jim Jagielski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Thom May wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi folks,
> 
> Hmmm... I wonder if we should hold off on 1.3.28 then. I'm
> leaning towards releasing 1.3.28 as-is, and us placing this
> in patches/ (and of course, being committed to 1.3.29-dev)...
> 
> Any objections?
I don't see that we should hold off 1.3.28, but maybe bring up the timescale
for .29 a bit afterwards. So yes, +1.
(Sorry for bringing this up today, but we litterally only found and fixed it
late last night)
Cheers
-Thom

Reply via email to