Is that a show-stopper?
has any decision been made on the answer to the question "what should r->filename be if a module determines in the translate_name hook that the uri does not map to any file that the web server can see?" ?
It isn't a showstopper to playing around with mod_include to not segfault if r->filename is NULL, but I detect that Cliff and perhaps others aren't happy with the idea that all sorts of code must protect it self from r->filename being NULL, and if that is fixed the adding logic to mod_include is a waste.
But I'm getting ahead of myself, and at this point am merely interested to opinions about what r->filename should be set to.
