On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: > IOW, every module has to deal with r->filename being NULL, and they can > be a little clever about it to avoid having to check r->filename all the > time. That's fine, that's the way it is today.
I suppose. :-/ > Cliff, what do you mean by the "r->filename problem". Just that all > necessary checks aren't in place, or that there may be another cleaner > grand scheme? I don't know, it just seems to me that it would be better for it to be "" than for it to be NULL. --Cliff
