> Ok, so Apache2 uptake is slower than desired for some (not all) on this > list. That's only logical given the success and therefore inertia to stay > with Apache 1.3. But there are more than a few other factors mentioned in > recent threads that are contributing to Apache2 development stagnation. > Ignore for a moment that vendors have only recently begun shipping Apache2 > as the default web server instead of Apache 1.3. Stas pointed out some > serious problems. I reformulate them slightly differently here.
Forgive my lack of english, but how can we reopen something that has never been closed? david
