Last benchmarks I have currently are quite old.
I think the last time I ( just a USER of Apache ) did
any serious benchmarking was 2.0.40 or something...
but the results were right inline with what Rasmus
just posted.
Apache 2.0 pre-fork was a pig compared to Apache 1.3 prefork.
If I get some time off from my 'real' job in the next little while
I will try and get you some benchmarks... but if you read my
last message you will see that it says...
> FACT?: <- That's a QUESTION MARK there.
> - Verify that's it's true. ( seems to be ). You have to
> KNOW, yourselves, where you are on the stopwatch and not
> wait for usrs to tell you.
> - If it's not (true)... do some marketing and make sure people KNOW IT.
> - If it is... fix it. Make it NOT TRUE.
That's kinda parta the problem right at the moment, isn't it?
Apache 2.0 has been out for almost 2 years and nobody
seems to be sure WHAT the real performance numbers are???
That's just an indication of how bad the lethargy has become
and/or how piss-poor the rollout follow-up on 2.0 has been.
Later...
Kevin
In a message dated 11/17/2003 2:01:13 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ------
> FACT?: Apache 2.0 pre-fork ( which is the only thing still available on
> some of the best platforms ) is SLOWER than Apache 1.3 pre-fork.
> ------
Do you have a supporting benchmark available? Benchmarking a PHP script as
Rasmus did does not express anything about the httpd.
Please don't continue to distribute misleading information again and again
you know nothing about.
nd
