Jess Holle wrote:
In other words, you can choose free, open-source software applications [client or server], but if you want a Microsoft server then you still have to pay for a Microsoft server OS.

This makes some sense -- all the more reason for the cost sensitive (among others) to use something else.

--
Jess Holle

[offtopic]
have you seen the price of the 'server' version of any of the major linux vendors?
I think MS Server may be cheaper if you want a supported corporate type machine




Reply via email to