At 11:19 AM 3/5/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >[SNIP] >>--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr." >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the >>entire mod_ssl 2.1 >>> back to 2.0. Only binary compat issues would need review. >>But too many >>> good things have happened on 2.1 to this specific component. >> >>I'd rather just start the 2.2 release cycle than do that. -- justin > >I think a lot of good things have gone into the mod_ssl 2.1 - if we start with 2.2, >we may still have to back-port the majority of fixes to 2.0 (as customers may not >jump immediately to 2.2).
Or to say it very simply - only one patch - connection upgrade - didn't really belong in 2.0 - yet it is harder and harder to keep in sync while dancing around that patch. Bill
