* Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > * include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface. > > > > Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump? > > I dunno, I don't really see the point in bumping the minor MMN more than > once between releases and it's already been bumped three times since > .48. > > In my mind an API is fixed in stone and supported only once it makes it > to a release tarball; anything in CVS is subject to change, removal etc. > So I'd say exactly one minor MMN bump is sufficient to differentiate the > new 2.0.49 API from the old 2.0.4[78] API. Maybe opinions differ...
Hmm. Third party development doesn't only occur after a release. I find these bumps in addition to their compat function also very good as a documenting tool (so we should at least add a short description about the bucket thing to the last bump). w.r.t. changes in CVS - we're in a stable branch. Nothing should be removed here after added (except Bugs ;-). If we start to work that way you described outside the development branch, then there's something really wrong. IMHO, of course... nd
