On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Rici Lake wrote: > > What about keeping the old error message, but logging an *additional* > > message at loglevel debug with the additional info? > > That is certainly possible but I was trying to make things as easy as possible > for newbies. I think having both modules available, and using a -D flag to > select which one to load would probably work out better. But that is just one > person's opinion.
I can say with relative certainty that you won't get people to agree to that solution. It involves a bunch of new complexity (distributing and compiling two almost-identical modules) for one new debugging feature. Opening httpd.conf and finding the LogLevel directive, which appears only once, should be relatively easy. > > - You'll get more people to read your patches if you use "diff -u". > > Tastes vary. Yes, tastes vary. But Apache has a "defined" taste: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html Joshua.