Fair enough. I guess I am being sensitive here, because the
last time I submitted a patch to some other project, I did
it with -u and got told that I should use -c. :)
Anyway, I apologise for being grumpy and look forward to comments
on the patch itself.
On 9-Jun-04, at 8:29 AM, Greg Marr wrote:
At 10:18 PM 6/8/2004, Rici Lake wrote:
The patch is now posted to bugzilla as [Bug 29450]. I believe that
conforms to the patches.html document cited below. Although that
document says -C3 is acceptable, I have submitted it in the
preferential -u format (which I also prefer, actually).
It says use -u, but if you absolutely *can't* do -u, then of the
remaining options, -C3 is the best, or at least, that is what it is
meant to say.
