The initial thought was you might have LDAP success, OS status success, and possibly multiple return codes that were considered successes.
Nothing was ever done with this. Bill At 02:40 PM 7/28/2004, Garrett Rooney wrote: >Geoffrey Young wrote: >>hi all >>I was just in garrett's APR talk here at oscon and he was mentioning the >>APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS macro, which I found interesting since httpd only uses >>it in a few places, opting for a direct comparison to APR_SUCCESS instead. >>should we move to APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS in all places? can someone who >>groks the nuances of the macro add some insight here? > >This is actually something I was wondering about as I wrote the presentation. >Neither Apache or Subversion use APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS everywhere, but I wonder if we >should, since if you look at the definition of the macro there are cases when it's >more than just (s) == APR_SUCCESS. > >-garrett
