At 08:55 AM 9/22/2004, you wrote: >Perhaps the fix to bug #24801 I recently provided could be included as well...
This patch? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=12817 I'm not as familiar with this cache code, Graham could you look at this? In any case, it's committed first to 2.1-dev, then reviewed by three folks, then committed back to 2.0. Unlikely to hit 2.0.52, but we will be releasing a 2.0.53 soon. If this is a regression from how 2.0.50 worked, we would redouble our efforts to include it immediately. With every release, we announce this version "is the best version available". When a regression of something that worked in the previous release suddenly breaks a new release, we work very hard to put it right again so users can adopt the latest version. It's a somewhat greater weight to get those re-fixed than to fix each and every outstanding bug. Participating on the dev list certainly will help get your patches reviewed more quickly, so thanks for pointing out that patch. Bill
