On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:20:49 +0200, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is there any reason why apr, apr-util, httpd mailing lists have
> Reply-To header set to the sender and not to the list itself.

the reason NOT to do it is that it is unintuitive to most people
(okay, just me and Mladen) and causes needless vigilance to "fix" the
To/Cc

(but [EMAIL PROTECTED] acts in the more intuitive manner, setting Reply-To to
the mailing list)

Reply via email to