> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 2:50 PM
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:20:49 +0200, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any reason why apr, apr-util, httpd mailing lists have >> Reply-To header set to the sender and not to the list itself. > the reason NOT to do it is that it is unintuitive to most people > (okay, just me and Mladen) and causes needless vigilance to "fix" the > To/Cc >(but [EMAIL PROTECTED] acts in the more intuitive manner, setting Reply-To to > the mailing list) Which I would have no issue with fixing... :^) Sander
