--On Monday, October 4, 2004 6:05 PM -0500 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

At 12:00 PM 10/4/2004, Jean-Frederic wrote:

I have prepared a patch to use apr-iconv instead "GNU" or system iconv.

I'm not hearing alot of interest in maintaining apr-iconv, and instead perhaps using the BSD port iconv-2.0 for Win32 and non iconv platforms.

What are other people's thoughts on this?

Agreed that apr-iconv could (should?) be restricted to Win32/NetWare/etc only. Either that, or someone needs to take the time to correctly integrate apr-iconv into the system.


I have some issues with the proposed patch in that it moves some configure logic that really belongs in apr-util over to httpd: i.e. configuration of apr-iconv should be done by apr-util not by httpd, httpd should only be aware of iconv via the apu-*-config scripts, etc. -- justin

Reply via email to