At 06:38 PM 10/4/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >I have some issues with the proposed patch in that it moves some configure logic that >really belongs in apr-util over to httpd: i.e. configuration of apr-iconv should be >done by apr-util not by httpd, httpd should only be aware of iconv via the >apu-*-config scripts, etc. -- justin
100% agreed - if you look at the doxygen, these interfaces are private to apr-util, users aren't to count on apr-iconv itself. Bill
