|
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/04 11:14 AM >>> --On Thursday, October 7, 2004 9:08 AM -0600 Jean-Jacques Clar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I *really* don't like the M prefix at all. I'd much prefer us to just spell >the thing out: CacheMem* and CacheDisk* instead of MCache and/or DCache. I >think a single letter prefix is really ambiguous. M what? I am not going to fight you on the prefix. I just want it to be different for each
module, that is what I will like to get done here.
I won't probably agree if we use 'Waboozle', and I suggest that the description
should with the name of the module like MemCache* and DiskCache* to
make it easier for related directives to be grouped together (sorted).
>If we go through the process of renaming the directives (and I'm +1 to making >it consistent per my first paragraph), I'd like to see us toss all of the >directives we don't implement. My only worry there is that they will disappear forever instead of always annoying us every time we open the c file or look at the doc page.
>BTW, are you volunteering to take the lead on this? ;-) -- justin
Yes with pleasure, this is why I started the debate.
JJ
|
- Re: mod_disk_cache directives naming convention Jean-Jacques Clar
- Re: mod_disk_cache directives naming convention Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: mod_disk_cache directives naming convention Glenn Strauss
- Re: mod_disk_cache directives naming convention Andreas Steinmetz
- Re: mod_disk_cache directives naming convention Andreas Steinmetz
- Re: mod_disk_cache directives naming conven... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: mod_disk_cache directives naming co... Justin Erenkrantz
