At 04:49 PM 11/7/2004, Andr� Malo wrote: >* "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, but it's still the 2.1 branch with 2.1 docs (docs-2.1/). And, of course, >once tagged and released (as alpha, beta, whatever) it *is* public. Though not >stable. That's a difference :)
That's your issue right there - no reason for a 2.1 docs tree :) It should be the 2.2 docs tree (with something in the 2.1 tarballs telling users that's the future version of this code.) Once all the changes to HEAD are done for httpd-docs-2.0, it will branch, and new work on the 2.3 dev will be sent again to cvs HEAD until 2.4 (or 3.0) goes out the door. To make things clearer, any textual context for the different docs flavors should indicate 'Apache 2.2 future release (2.1 development)'. 2.1 is entirely developer/beta oriented. Bill
