At 02:50 AM 11/6/2004, you wrote: >--On Thursday, November 4, 2004 10:34 PM -0800 Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL >PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>Any comments, naming preferences, "put it in apr-util you twit" flames? >> >>"Put it in apr-util, you marvelous angel." Pretty please with sugar on >>top... > >Point to note that if it goes into APR, it'd have to be in APR-util 1.1. I'd >be fine with making httpd depend on 1.1+, but...
But what? It seems as though Allen's patches to correctly handle 32bit int/64bit ptr sizes is going to require a bump to APR version 2.0 for the API changes. So folding these changes into a later version of APR should prove fairly harmless. Bill
