On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >And, that, I believe jeopardizes the overall quality of the code. > >And, I'm not willing to take that risk. > > I entirely agree - stability of the already-done version 2.0 is > paramount to me. However we need to make some edge case expections > for that code which only one or two voulenteers are familiar with. > e.g. Win32 service code is only known by 4 members, Novell by only > one, and ldap only three of us ever pay attention.
Yes, "one size fits all" has its problems, whatever that size is. If we have a "taking responsibility" review, components that should be considered special cases will presumably become clear. > 'Platform maintainers' should have some way to get measurable and > tested code improvements back into 2.0. Minority platforms look like a good candidate for special cases. -- Nick Kew
