Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Garrett Rooney wrote:


I guess I'm just arguing for a single branch that's the target of the
current development, as opposed to one 64 bit dev branch and one trunk
which holds other changes, thus requiring us to either invest constant
effort in merging changes from the trunk into the 64 bit branch or
letting it get kind of stale and then having a mega-huge merge into the
trunk at the end.


The only question is whether we want to keep trunk as 1.1-dev or 2.0-dev.
But I guess with SVN it's easy to branch 1.1 and 1.0 off of what's now the
1.0 branch (rename the 1.0 branch to 1.1 and branch a new 1.0 branch off
of that, or whatever).

Exactly.

So sure, screw it. APR trunk is now 2.0-dev. Have fun.

The only thing we need to be sure of is publicising this fact to our consumers. People are probably used to being able to check out trunk and get the 1.x API, so if we're planning on changing the API we need to make it clear that those people need to be using the 1.0.x branch.


-garrett

Reply via email to