Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> AFAICT, that module requires libapreq2. So, we'd have to bring it all > into our tree. Why would you need to do that? I don't know what Bill's expecting, but it'd be a total surprise to me if he were suggesting making mod_apreq2 a mandatory module for 2.2 (ie, always installed). OTOH, C developers that want to use libapreq2 for their apache modules aren't well served unless apreq becomes a core feature of the server. Which might be a good idea for 2.4, or not. So if I were the one making the proposal for 2.2 inclusion, I'd offer to include those 4 C files referenced earlier, and configuring httpd to treat them as optional module. -- Joe Schaefer
