Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
AFAICT, that module requires libapreq2. So, we'd have to bring it all
into our tree.
Why would you need to do that? I don't know what Bill's expecting, but it'd be a total surprise to me if he were suggesting making mod_apreq2 a mandatory module for 2.2 (ie, always installed). OTOH, C developers that want to use libapreq2 for their apache modules aren't well served unless apreq becomes a core feature of the server. Which might be a good idea for 2.4, or not.
So if I were the one making the proposal for 2.2 inclusion, I'd offer to include those 4 C files referenced earlier, and configuring httpd to treat them as optional module.
I don't see how an optional module that depends on an external library is that helpful compared to the current situation. (Module bundled with the Library.)
It makes the most sense to me to include the library and module if we do this. I don't think including both should be done at this time.
-Paul
