On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:37:58PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > I agree about both of those. And I'd say the same even more strongly for > mod_dbd, simply because it (or whatever it becomes when updated in the > light of real-life experience) should become the basis of a new generation > of applications. If it's there, it'll start to permeate the Usual Suspects > like mod_perl. If not, we'll still have the old situation of Perl, Python, > PHP, Tcl, Authentication, Logging etc each maintaining its own separate > database connections, and having to reinvent the connection pooling > wheel if they want to if they want to improve scalability. > big +1 - let's not toss all the cool new features before the release and get into the same situation as 1.3 -> 2.0 having trouble convincing people that it was worth the upgrade.
vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
