Brian Akins wrote: > > Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > > Looks useful, but file://|/bin/foo would be very non-intuitive for piped > > loggers, balancing the backwards compatibility might need a bit more, I > > guess "pipe://" or "cmd://" schemes might make sense also. > > > True. I just used uri's as they seemed to just "fit." I'm not > particularly tied to the configuration interface. Any interest in me > changing it to use "cmd://"? >
'pipe' is clearer I think... -- ======================================================================= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
