Joe Orton wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:28:43AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:16:04AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > mod_dbd is explicitly mentioned as a new feature of 2.2 > > > > and, therefore, a compelling reason to upgrade. Either > > > > we stop refering to mod_dbd as something special enough > > > > to warrant special attention as a core enhancement or > > > > we fix it so it *is* one. > > > > > > The fact that no one has ever cared to make mod_dbd work on Windows until > > > the precise instance that we're to go to GA is complete evidence that this > > > is not a showstopper. It's not even in the default build! > > > > > > It can wait until the next release of 2.2. We can note it in the release > > > notes and move along. -- justin > > > > > > > I would agree, as long as we remove it for the What's New > > pages until it actually works and builds. > > > > My point, obviously, was that we can't have it both ways and > > say mod_dbd is great and a new core enhancement if it doesn't > > even build under Win32. > > Win32 is not special. It's a second-class citizen if anything because > it gets so little developer attention. >
Now *that's* a statement for the Release Notes :) -- ======================================================================= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
