On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:35:07PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
I'm looking at this. If you give that apu buildconf the right --
with- apr parameter, buildconf completes. The problem is, if the
Just to reiterate - buildconf is not necessary for users to run.
Therefore, if it's broken for 2.2.0, it's not a showstopper. --
justin
Is buildconf present? If the user runs it, does it corrupt the
unpacked tree?
If this is so, and it's broken, then perhaps remove buildconf
throughout the
tree, and the autoconf source files, resulting in a vanilla ./
configure for
the resulting distribution package?
Hm... you kinda need it if you drop in a custom module with its
config5.m4 foo. Or if you want to build with a different libtool than
httpd came with. I agree that's kinda deep though.
I wouldn't hold up the release for it.
S.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
