* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-23 13:57:17]: > --On December 23, 2005 1:56:03 PM -0800 "Roy T. Fielding" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Dec 23, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote: > >>Ok, updated tarballs have been uploaded to > >><http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_mbox>. Vote is restarted. > > > >They should be called 0.2.1, though I'll let that pass as there were > >no code changes. However, you do need to remember to check the > >file permissions after uploading the files. They need to be > > > > chmod 664 * > > > >I fixed them myself the last time, but don't have time right now. > > His umask is probably incorrect. It needs to be 002. -- justin
Yes, I forgot to check the umask before moving files. I won't forget next time. Btw, why does this tarball should be called 0.2.1 ? Just because I changed some files in the archive ? I just need some explainations : since 0.2.0 was never released, why sould we increment the revision number to 0.2.1 ? Thanks, - Sam -- Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org) -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
