--On December 24, 2005 12:00:57 AM +0100 Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Btw, why does this tarball should be called 0.2.1 ? Just because I
changed some files in the archive ? I just need some explainations :
since 0.2.0 was never released, why sould we increment the revision number
to 0.2.1 ?

Yes, a release is one-shot only. Once you announce it, it's technically "burned." This is why we don't have release candidates... It is either approved or it isn't. -- justin

Reply via email to