Daniel J. Popowich wrote ..
> Graham Dumpleton writes:
> > 
> > On 03/02/2006, at 4:48 AM, Daniel J. Popowich wrote:
> > > My gut says any major release of mod_python be based on one
> > > major.minor release lower than the currently available python.  So,
> > > mod_python 3.2 is based on python 2.3; mod_python 3.3 will probably
> be
> > > based on python 2.4 (because 2.5 will be out by then).
> >
> > Unfortunately, we are going to be stuck with Python 2.3 for quite a
> > while probably. You stand to anger a lot of Mac OS X users, me
> > included, if Python 2.4 is required. This is because Apple still
> > only ships 2.3.5 even with its latest OS. It is looking to be a year
> > before next OS from Apple is out and adopted.
> 
> You can run 2.4 today!  That's what Fink is for!!!

I know you can get Python 2.4 from fink and there is also MacPython
package as well. I and I suspect many others prefer to use what the OS
provides rather than load on a whole lot of extra stuff. Many would
be ignorant that there are even alternatives. We can't ignore that.

Graham

Reply via email to