Garrett Rooney wrote: > > On 3/6/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the whole issue revolves around whether the balancer > > should, or should not, pre-open connections and manage them > > internally, or whether it should be one-shot. The real > > power is being able to load balance, and implement > > that in a central location. > > > > So it seems to me that some sort of Balancer member > > option that determines whether or not the connection > > is "persistent" or not would alleviate some of > > the issues you raise. > > We actually have a way to do that, it's the close_on_recycle flag, and > I had to turn it on in order to get anything approaching reliability > for fastcgi. >
That's how we do it *internally* and not what I meant. I meant more a parameter to be set in httpd.conf... -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
