Jess Holle wrote:
So does that mean if one grabs the 2.2.1 tar ball one will not be able
to build on Windows?
Correct, but the 2.2.2 tarball will build on windows (with a bumped aprutil).
That's why I think the concensus, between borked Win32/Netware and a missing
proxy patch, is to reroll and get the 2.2.2 out immediately this week.
Oh, my personal vote to the RM's tally is -1 (moving rapidly to 2.2.2).
If so, that's not a very compelling tarball for those needing to support
Windows.
If 2.2.1 is being labeled as non-GA already then that's quite
appropriate, move on to 2.2.2 as soon as possible. 2.2.1 shouldn't be
labeled as GA if it does not build on Windows "as is", though.
2.2.1 is labeled nothing right now, that's why the thread is [VOTE].
