Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > So, I think our real options are; > > 's/NNNN-NNNN/NNNN/' and simply delete the latter year entirely. > This is minimal change, but assumes that I actually have a clue here > and get what the legal issue is. And this hasn't been approved > by ASF legal. > > Migrate to the jackrabbit notice, because at least it has been > approved and we judge the inconvience of seemingly slightly > adversarial to users less bad than the inconvience of having > less credibility in legal matters. > > Personally, I'd prefer the latter, though I'm also entirely happy to > live with the risk/credibility issue of the existing text, this really > is hair-splitting hypotheticial territory. >
If the latter has full approval from our true legal team, then I'm ++1 for handling is right now and being done with it. As mentioned before, this should be a universal ASF change, not just httpd. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
