On Wed, 3 May 2006 11:39:02 -0700 "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 3, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Davi Arnaut wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 May 2006 14:31:06 +0200 (SAST) > > "Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, May 3, 2006 1:26 am, Davi Arnaut said: > >> > >>>> Then you will end up with code that does not meet the > >>>> requirements of > >>>> HTTP, and you will have wasted your time. > >>> > >>> Yeah, right! How ? Hey, you are using the Monty Python argument > >>> style. > >>> Can you point to even one requirement of HTTP that my_cache_provider > >>> wont meet ? > >> > >> Yes. Atomic insertions and deletions, the ability to update headers > >> independantly of body, etc etc, just go back and read the thread. > > > > I can't argue with a zombie, you keep repeating the same > > misunderstands. > > > >> Seriously, please move this off list to keep the noise out of > >> people's > >> inboxes. > > > > Fine, I give up. > > For the record, Graham's statements were entirely correct, > Brian's suggested architecture would slow the HTTP cache, > and your responses have been amazingly childish for someone > who has earned zero credibility on this list. Fine, I do have zero credibility. > I suggest you stop defending a half-baked design theory and > just go ahead and implement something as a patch. If it works, > that's great. If it slows the HTTP cache, I will veto it myself. I'm already doing this. > There is, of course, no reason why the HTTP cache has to use > some new middle-layer back-end cache, so maybe you could just > stop arguing about vaporware and simply implement a single > mod_backend_cache that doesn't try to be all things to all people. > > Implement it and then convince people on the basis of measurements. > That is a heck of a lot easier than convincing everyone to dump > the current code based on an untested theory. > I just wanted to get comments (the original idea wasn't mine). It wasn't my intention to flame anyone, I'm not mad or anything. I was just stating my opinion. I maybe wrong, but I don't give up easy. :) -- Davi Arnaut
