Brian Akins wrote:
Not wanting to stir the huge pot o' stuff that is going on here, but
what are the thoughts of renaming mod_cache to mod_http_cache? mod_cache
is http specific. This would follow the general ide that mod_proxy uses.
I am not suggesting changing any functionality at this time, simply
renaming it to a more suitable name.
Not in 2.2 branch, but in trunk? The issue is that it's half httpd, and
half generic. Let me mull this over.
If we layer it, I can entirely agree that there should be a mod_http_cache
that's entirely concerned with the content negotation handshake of http.
But in all other respects, mod_cache is equally useful for other protocols
such as mod_ftp (it takes advantage of it now, only with one possible
variant because ftp doesn't speak in variants.)
Bill
