On Wed, May 31, 2006 3:47 pm, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> Of course, there is a growing school of thought that questions
> whether the whole AJP stuff itself is worthwhile... just
> proxy HTTP and be done with it. :)

This was a question raised way back when before the ajp work started, the
question was whether mod_jk or mod_proxy_http was faster. It turned out
mod_jk was faster, and so we have mod_proxy_ajp, but that was in the days
before mod_proxy_http had a connection pool and load balancing.

It would be interesting to benchmark http and ajp again to see what the
difference is today with the connection pool enabled on both.


Reply via email to