On Wed, May 31, 2006 3:47 pm, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Of course, there is a growing school of thought that questions > whether the whole AJP stuff itself is worthwhile... just > proxy HTTP and be done with it. :)
This was a question raised way back when before the ajp work started, the question was whether mod_jk or mod_proxy_http was faster. It turned out mod_jk was faster, and so we have mod_proxy_ajp, but that was in the days before mod_proxy_http had a connection pool and load balancing. It would be interesting to benchmark http and ajp again to see what the difference is today with the connection pool enabled on both. Regards, Graham --
