Mladen Turk wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'm would like to give few notes on the things I'm > currently working on, so that eventually no duplicate > work is done if someone already have similar things > on his drawing board. > > 1. Additional by business load balancing method > that will load balance on the actual load of the > beckend servers. The servers that have shorter reply > time will get more load.
If this maps what's currently been done in mod_jk, than a big +1. It's been on my todo but have simply not had the cycles to do. I liked the new busyness algo, but then there was a total rewrite (well, not total) of it all, most likely since mod_jk doesn't want to use providers, that makes all the lb determination "by value"... I was thinking about extended the LB structs to also include some sort of LB lbstatus calculation which meant another cool abstraction and making the whole make-lb-algos-independent closer to reality. > > 2. Hot standby support. Something we have recently added > to the mod_jk that allows to have the 'hot-standby' > backend node, that sits there and does nothing until > all the other nodes fail. > +1 > 3. CPING/CPONG support for the AJP protocol, for checking > the status of the backend server prior of sending the > data itself. This will be cool, but I don't think too easy. Still +1 for the effort :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
