Mladen Turk wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > If this maps what's currently been done in mod_jk, than > > a big +1. It's been on my todo but have simply not > > had the cycles to do. > > That is exactly the thing that I'm planing to do. > During last year there was a lots of good stuff > added to the mod_jk that have even force some of > the users used to try to compile and use mod_jk with > httpd 2.2. IMHO there is no reason why we could > not port all that good stuff. It's on my TODO list, > and I'm glad to hear that you guys have the same > thoughts. Perhaps I could explain all that to the > much wider audience in Austin this September ;) ? >
++1 ;) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
