On 07/26/2006 12:07 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Wednesday 26 July 2006 11:02, Mladen Turk wrote: > > >>There are lots of things to backport. IMHO its the entire HEAD, >>and spread over the multiple svn commits. >>How we should deal with that? >>Having multiple backports or a single one? > > > IMO if we try and deal with that for a security release this week, > we'll botch it. Better to propose backports with a view to 2.2.4.
+1. There is no need to have the same timely distance between 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 as between 2.2.2 and 2.2.3. So lets do 2.2.3 without them, review them carefully and push out 2.2.4. I guess if we get all these backported it justifies a new minor release anyway > > As for number of backports, the ease (or otherwise) of reviewing > it is the most important criterion. So perhaps group closely > related changes in a single proposal, but split any that are > only loosely related. +1 Regards Rüdiger
