On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jim Jagielski
In other words, lets assume members a, b and c are in
set 0 and d, e and f are in set 1 and g, h and i are in
set 2. We check a, b and c and they are not usable, so
we now start checking set 1. Should we re-check the
members in set 0 (maybe they are usable now) or
just check members of set 1 (logically, the question
is whether we doing a <= set# or == set#). I have
both methods coded and am flip-flopping on which
makes the most sense. I'm leaning towards #1 (<=set#).
(BTW:
<feature-creep>
will it be possible to disable complete cluster sets via the manager?
</feature-creep>
)and thus forcing them back to cluster set 0.
At present, we are more member-centric than "set" centric.
You can disable ind members of a set, but not a whole set.
If useful, this could be added at some point...
